Home Jury & Process The Award and Awardee Partners Nomination
Independent Jury

The Panel

A panel bringing together institutional expertise, research depth, and newsroom leadership to evaluate excellence in contemporary Indian journalism.

Lt. Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah (Retd.)

Lt. Gen. Zameer Uddin Shah (Retd.)

(SM, VSM, PVSM) (Retd.) & Former Vice-Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU)

Former Deputy Chief of the Army Staff (Personnel & Systems) and former Vice-Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University. Evaluates journalism through the lens of strategic ground reality, structural discipline, and institutional accountability.

Rahul Dev

Rahul Dev

Veteran Indian Journalist, television anchor, & language activist

Veteran journalist and public language advocate, former Editor-in-Chief of Jansatta. Evaluates journalism through the lens of language preservation, media ethics, and the public responsibilities of media systems.

Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty

Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty

First Woman President Press Club of India

National Affairs Editor at The Wire and President of the Press Club of India. Evaluates journalism through the lens of frontline newsroom management, checking for ethical field reporting and regional diversity.

Qamar Waheed Naqvi

Qamar Waheed Naqvi

Veteran Indian Journalist

Former News Director at TV Today Network (Aaj Tak) and current Director at Satya Hindi. Evaluates journalism through the lens of print, broadcast, and digital leadership, checking for narrative integrity and public accessibility.

Prof. Ashutosh Varshney

Prof. Ashutosh Varshney

Renowned political scientist and author

Sol Goldman Professor of International Studies and the Social Sciences at Brown University. Evaluates journalism through the lens of political science, checking for democratic resilience, academic depth, and societal impact.

Methodology

Selection Process

A four-stage structured evaluation with complete independence and no public voting at any stage.

1. Nominations

Open submissions from the public along with curated recommendations from domain experts and editorial partners.

2. Screening

All entries are rigorously reviewed by an internal team for eligibility, category alignment, and minimum quality standards.

3. Evaluation

Shortlisted entries are assessed by the jury panel on four criteria:

Credibility Depth of Analysis Public Relevance Consistency

4. Final Selection

The jury independently determines all winners through a structured consensus process. There is no public voting.